Ex-ECB research director warns EU could soon face twin crises

  • Written by MarketWatch
  • Published in Economics

MILAN (Project Syndicate[1]) — Next May’s European Parliament election is likely to be haunted by Europe’s inner demons, from the clash with Italy’s populist government over its budget[2] to the xenophobic front that has formed in the Visegrád countries. The crisis of the traditional centrist parties, which have been essential to building and maintaining consensus in the European Union — even as they have struggled to implement needed reforms — is also far from resolved. But if, as current indicators suggest, Europe is facing an economic slowdown, the pre-election discourse could change significantly.

Until a few months ago, the prevailing narrative was that the economic crisis was over, even for the hard-hit countries of the eurozone’s periphery. As a result, Europeans had shifted their attention to other issues, such as refugees and security, that were threatening political stability and eroding consensus for the European project.

But GDP growth in the eurozone has been slowing since its peak in the third and fourth quarters of 2017. The persistent weakening of the eurozone economy — even in Germany, GDP contracted in the third quarter of 2018[3] — does not bode well for the EU, which could be facing twin political and economic crises.

The obvious question is why the eurozone recovery is waning, even amid highly supportive expansionary monetary policies. In fact, if growth has really peaked, it would imply that the eurozone’s potential growth rate is about 1%. This rate of potential output growth — roughly half the pre-crisis trend — is associated with an aggregate unemployment rate of about 8%.

The eurozone’s flagging growth reflects old and new structural problems, the legacy of the last crisis (which still weighs on banks’ asset quality), high debt levels in some countries, and external shocks that have affected demand. In other words, Europe faces challenges to its potential growth, as well as negative cyclical forces. The latter, in particular, call for an aggressive response — not least because, if the eurozone economy were to enter a recession in the near future, it would have limited policy tools with which to counter it.

While Europe has better crisis-management tools than it did when the last recession hit in 2011, they remain incomplete. Moreover, the European Central Bank will have less space to use monetary policy to kick-start the economy: interest rates are already at zero, and a new asset-purchase program would inevitably be controversial.

Read: ECB’s Draghi says QE will end in December despite data[4]

Fiscal policy is in a similarly weak position. Of course, it is critical to avoid repeating the mistake that was made in 2009, when EU leaders embraced rapid fiscal consolidation before the recovery had gained its legs. But, to counter the cyclical slowdown, more stimulus would be needed.

Yet a new recession would cause financial markets to become even more deeply divided along national lines,...

Read more from our friends at MarketWatch

38°F

Philadelphia

Clear

Humidity: 73%

Wind: 6.84 m/h

  • 18 Jan 2021 44°F 35°F
  • 19 Jan 2021 42°F 31°F